Showing 491 results

List of subscribers from New York to the St. Enda’s School Building Fund. The list provides the amount given by each subscriber.

Catalogue of books held in the library of the offices of Fr. Henry Anglin OFM Cap., editor of 'The Capuchin Annual', and Fr. Donal O’Mahony OFM Cap., editor of 'The Father Mathew Record'. The catalogue lists Irish history books and periodicals, as well as compilations and anthologies of Irish literature, prose and poetry, and religious texts. The file also contains information re a weekly draw in aid of the Capuchin Foreign Missions (21 Sept. 1968).

Photographic prints of the state visit by The Taoiseach, Liam Cosgrave (1920-2017), to the United States in March 1976. The prints are credited to Tom Mathews Photography, New York, and Jack McManus, Kilmacud, Dublin. The file includes the following images:

• President Gerald Ford and Liam Cosgrave inspect a guard of honour at the White House, Washington, on St. Patrick’s Day, 1976.
• Cosgrave with Abraham Beame, Mayor of New York.
• Cosgrave with Richard J. Daley, Mayor of Chicago.
• Cosgrave with Kurt Waldheim, Secretary General of the United Nations, in New York.

Letters to Patrick Pearse from M. Lally, Irish Industrial Development Company, 514 Parkway Building, Philadelphia, re arrangements for a meeting in Wilmington in aid of St. Enda’s School.

letter to Patrick Pearse from Martin Jerome Keogh, Supreme Court of the State of New York, New Rochelle, New York, re donations to Pearse’s St. Enda’s School fund. The file includes a letter from John Sheehan, 253 Broadway, New York City, to Keogh enclosing $25 for the fund.

Letters to James Pearse, 27 Great Brunswick Street, Dublin, from the Treasurer’s Department, City of Birmingham Council, re the repayment of a loan of £100. The file includes a statement of loan repayment and a receipt for the same.

Letters to James Pearse from a Mr. Humphreys, ‘The National Reformer’, 20 Circus Road, St. John’s Wood, London. The letters to a manuscript sent by Pearse for possible publication. Humphreys affirms that Charles Bradlaugh ‘has been so much occupied with the litigation that he has not yet had time to examine’ the manuscript (29 December 1889).